The Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction 2020: Some Contenders?

WalterScottPrizeThe deadline for publishers to submit books published in 2019 for The Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction 2020 passed on 20th December 2019 (a little earlier than in previous years).

Like other historical fiction fans, I shall be eagerly awaiting the announcement of the longlist and the ‘Academy Recommends’ list in March. Last year, I only managed to read five of the twelve longlisted novels but those five represented all but one of the six shortlisted novels.  You can find links to my reviews hereThis year I’ll try to read as many as possible of the longlisted novels that I haven’t read already and all those that make it on to the shortlist.

There were some fantastic historical fiction novels published in 2019 and listed below are some I’ve read that I’d love to see make the longlist (subject to them meeting all the eligibility criteria).  (Links from the titles will take you to my reviews.)

In addition, there are some books in my TBR pile I haven’t got around to reading yet but which, judging from reviews, may well deserve a place.  Finally, there are a few others that I’m yet to acquire but which also look like possible contenders for inclusion. (Links from the titles will take you to the book description on Goodreads.)

Check back when the longlist is announced to see how my picks match the judges’ choices – if at all!


Books I read and loved in 2019 

Once Upon A River  by Diane Setterfield

The Secrets We Kept by Lara Prescott

The Confessions of Frannie Langton by Sara Collins

Blackberry and Wild Rose by Sonia Velton

Blood & Sugar by Laura Shepherd-Robinson

The Phoenix of Florence by Philip Kazan

Nemesis (Tom Wilde #3) by Rory Clements

The Glittering Hour by Iona Grey

The Photographer of the Lost by Carolyn Scott

The Mathematical Bridge by Jim Kelly

The Glass Woman by Caroline Lea

The Familiars by Stacey Halls

The Road to Grantchesterby James Runcie

The Night Tiger by Yangsze Choo

Fled by Meg Keneally

The Mermaid’s Call by Katherine Stansfield

This Mortal Boy by Fiona Kidman

Books in my TBR pile

The Hiding Game by Naomi Wood

Things in Jars by Jess Kidd

Wakenhyrst by Michelle Paver

The Doll Factory by Elizabeth Macneal

The Binding by Bridget Collins

Books ‘on my RADAR’

The Offing by Benjamin Myers

Are any of your favourites on my list?  What other historical fiction novels published in 2019 do you think deserve to be nominated?

Buchan of the Month: Introducing…John Burnet of Barns by John Buchan

February’s Buchan of the Month is John Buchan’s first full-length novel, John Burnet of Barns. (His first published novel, Sir Quixote of the Moors, was reviewed last month.) You can find out more about the project and my reading list for 2020 here.

John Burnet of Barns was published by John Lane on 3rd June 1898, although it had first appeared in serial form in Chamber’s Journal between December 1897 and August 1898.

Buchan’s first biographer, Janet Adam Smith, reports Buchan had begun to collect notes for this ‘novel of Tweeddale’ in 1894 with the intention of starting to write it the following summer. By the time he was at Brasenose College, Oxford in 1895, the novel was nearly finished, he had taken on a literary agent and had three publishers interested in it: Blackwood, Fisher Unwin and John Lane. He received a £100 advance from John Lane, the book’s eventual publisher in the UK.

Like Sir Quixote of the Moors, John Burnet of Barns is written in the first person and set in 17th century Scotland at a time of political and religious turmoil. However, its hero is not a French knight (as in Sir Quixote) but a boy from Tweeddale with, as Janet Adam Smith notes, interests and experiences very similar to Buchan’s own, namely ‘a taste for fishing and philosophy and long excursions into the hills’. She also points to characteristics that would feature in later Buchan novels, such as the hero being a ‘passionate moderate’ and his hatred for his enemy being tempered by a degree of admiration (see John Laputa in Prester John or Dominick Medina in The Three Hostages).

However, Janet Adam Smith notes that Buchan himself was rather ashamed of the book, later describing it as a ‘hotch-potch’ and ‘very immature and boyish’. Although conceding the book has some of the same faults as Sir Quixote of the Moors, David Daniell is rather more generous describing it as ‘a fine book for a first long novel’ and commenting that if it is a ‘hotch-potch’ it is at least a fascinating one.

No sales figures are available for the original edition of the book or the shilling edition published by John Lane in 1916 but, by the time Janet Adam Smith’s biography of John Buchan was published in 1965, the paperback edition published by Pan in 1952 had sold 30,000 copies.

David Daniell sums up John Burnet of Barns as ‘a clever, searching analysis of non-commitment done with a good deal of novelistic skill’. Look out for my review later this month to see if I agree.

Sources:

Janet Adam Smith, John Buchan: A Biography (OUP, 1985 [1965])
David Daniell, The Interpreter’s House: A Critical Assessment of John Buchan (Nelson, 1975)
Kenneth Hillier and Michael Ross, The First Editions of John Buchan: A Collector’s Illustrated Biography (Avonworld, 2008)

20200205_130743-1