#EventReview David Suchet at Henley Literary Festival 2019 @HenleyLitFest

This is a longer version of a review that first appeared in the Henley Standard on 9th October 2019 and on the Henley Standard website. It is based on notes I took during the event and my own recollections. Any errors in recording views expressed during the discussion are my own.

A rapturous reception greeted acclaimed actor David Suchet as he arrived in the Finlay Suite at Phyllis Court to discuss his recently published book, Behind the Lens: My Life, with theatre journalist Al Senter.

David Suchet at Henley Literary Festival 2019Al started by asking David why he’d decided to ‘let his photographs do the talking’. Describing Behind the Lens as a photo memoir rather than an autobiography, David said he’d always had an aversion to writing about himself.  He’s played many different characters in his career – including Poirot, for which he always gets a round of applause when he drops into character (and did on this occasion too) – but in his words, “That’s not me”.  David explained the aim of the book is for people get to know the man behind the characters. Firstly, through his photographs by showing the way he sees things.  Secondly, by speaking directly to the reader (the book was recorded and then converted to text) about important things in his life – family, music, what makes him choose roles.

Al asked David how he first became interested in photography.  David said it was through his grandfather, the Fleet Street photographer James (Jimmy) Jarché, who took the first photograph of Wallis Simpson with Edward VIII.  David said in many ways his grandfather was a more important figure in his life than his father. Born in Rotherhithe, Jimmy was ‘a man for all people’ who photographed royalty but would also chat to and photograph homeless people. David explained his grandfather taught him about technique and would then send him out to take photographs. Having developed the film, his grandfather would go over each frame with him, critiquing the images. David said his grandfather told him the most important lens he’d ever have was the eyes God gave him and the most important skill ‘learning to look’.

David is never without his camera (he had it on the table in front of him) and his photographs are always an emotional reaction to something. As he put it, something that makes him go ‘Ooh’, whether a person, an object or a landscape. Although there are pictures in the book of people he’s worked with, they’re included because there’s something about them that caught his eye. He talked about how he goes for ‘mindful photographic walks’ where he just walks until he sees something that provokes an emotional response.

Al said he got the sense from the book it was not inevitable that David would become an actor. David explained his earliest ambition was to become a doctor (his father was a surgeon). As someone who dislikes tension, disharmony and arguments, David said he’d always found himself drawn to the idea of healing. Then he wanted to become a documentary filmmaker. He joked that he was nearly lots of things. After being cast in the school play as the ‘Scottish King’ (out of theatrical superstition he avoided naming Shakespeare’s play), he was encouraged to audition for the National Youth Theatre. He recalled one time at the end of a performance when he’d watched the lights being lowered, looked around the auditorium, remembered the audience laughing and thought to himself, ‘This is how I want to spend my life’.

David also talked about his early career, how he discovered his forte as a character actor and learned how to transform himself into someone else. Commenting that people have rarely seen him playing himself, he quipped ‘This is probably the first time….you’re very lucky!’ Al said he understood David’s father was hostile to the idea of him becoming an actor. David said it upset him in the beginning as his father pretty much cut him off, only really coming round when he joined the Royal Shakespeare Company in 1973.

Naturally, David couldn’t escape talking about a certain Belgian detective. Al wondered if he’d thought about playing the role when he appeared as Inspector Japp alongside Peter Ustinov as Poirot in the TV film Thirteen at Dinner (an adaptation of Agatha Christie’s Lord Edgware Dies). David exclaimed it was one of the two worst performances of his career. (He later revealed, in answer to a question from an audience member, that the other one is the film Wing Commander). He explained it was one of the very few occasions in which he took a job purely for the money as it enabled him to accept a stage role as Iago. However, making the film did allow him to meet Peter Ustinov whom he described as ‘a great man’. In Peter’s trailer one day, David said he’d confessed he’d like to play Poirot one day and Peter had replied, ‘I think you might be very good’.

In 1988 he was contacted by a producer and offered the role of Poirot in a TV series comprising ten one-hour adaptations of the short stories.  Unsure whether to accept it, David contacted his older brother who advised him ‘not to touch it with a barge pole’, which goes to show, he said, that you should never listen to advice from your siblings.

Al commented that many actors don’t want to play the same role for any length of time for fear of being typecast and wondered if that had been a concern for David.  David explained that he was only ever offered a one year renewable contract to play Poirot which enabled him to fit in other work in the theatre.  He commented, ‘I’m an actor for hire; that’s how I like to spend my life.’

Al asked if David had any interest in the ‘golden age’ of detective fiction.  David confessed he’d never been a great reader as his life has been all about reading scripts and research. He rarely reads fiction.  As he said, ‘My life is fiction…I play fiction.’  He does however have a keen interest in theology and the early history of the Christian church.

David went on to talk about dealing with rejection (an occupational hazard for an actor), how he goes about preparing for roles and his admiration for the work of playwright Arthur Miller.  In a fascinating insight, he explained how he likes to read through a script several times and then read it again minus the character he’s playing to find out what’s missing and what the playwright intended his character to contribute to the work overall.

20191004_113648_resizedAudience questions included David’s favourite photographs in the book and his feelings about an age where just about everyone has a camera on their phone.  Responding to the latter, he said, ‘If you’ve always got a camera with you, you’ve got a chance of turning banality into something artistic and special’.  An answer characteristic of this thoughtful, eloquent and fascinating speaker.

20191004_113631-1_resized_2Afterwards audience members rushed to purchase the book and, like me, joined the long queue of people waiting to have David sign their copy, to exchange a few words with him, and, for a lucky few, to have their photograph taken with him.

All royalties from David’s book will go to The Tuberous Sclerosis Association, an incurable condition from which his grandson suffers.


Behind the LensAbout the Book

A stalwart of stage and screen, David has wowed thousands of fans with his committed performances and is rarely seen without his camera. In Behind the Lens, he shares evocative photographs from his personal archives that capture the finest moments from his glittering 50-year career alongside musings on his life experiences.

He talks about growing up in his beloved London and reveals how his Jewish roots have influenced his career. He also discusses the joys and perils of fame, his love of photography and music and reflects on the changing nature of the acting industry.

Format: Hardcover (320 pp.)              Publisher: Constable
Publication date: 3rd October 2019 Genre: Memoir, Photography, Nonfiction

Find Behind the Lens: My Life on Goodreads


About the Author

David Suchet, CBE is an English actor best known known for his work on the stage and British television for which he has earned international praise.

#EventReview Michael Joseph Proof Party at Henley Literary Festival 2019

This is a longer version of a review that appeared on The Henley Standard website. It is based on notes I took during the event and my own recollections. Any errors in recording views expressed during the discussion are my own.

20190930_115917_resized
Stephanie Wrobel, Hope Adams and Stephanie Cross preparing to address the audience

After being welcomed onboard Hobbs of Henley’s Hibernia with a glass of fizz, book critic and writer Stephanie Cross got the party started by introducing us to authors Stephanie Wrobel and Hope Adams. (As we were blessed with the presence of two Stephanies, to avoid confusion, SC in this blog post refers to Stephanie Cross.) Both authors have debut novels out next year so SC remarked it seemed fitting today’s event was taking place on a boat; a maiden voyage in more than one sense.  Hope’s novel even opens on board a ship on the River Thames.  She described both books, The Recovery of Rose Gold and Conviction, as “twisty, stay up all night reads”.

SC then invited Hope and Stephanie to talk about their books, the inspiration behind them and read short extracts.

Hope explained that whilst visiting an exhibition of quilts at the Victoria & Albert Museum in 2009 she’d been intrigued to learn that one beautiful example was sewn by female convicts aboard a ship, the Rajah.  When she discovered that, by the end of the three month voyage, one of the prisoners had become engaged to the Captain, the idea for Conviction was born. She quipped that if she’d made up that last turn of events her editor would probably have said, ‘Don’t be silly’. For various reasons, Hope only took up the idea for the book again in 2016.

Asked about her research for the book, Hope said the voyage was quite well-documented but admitted she’d invented an awful lot such as changing real names. The exception was the three main characters, including the book’s heroine, Kezia Hayter.  Kezia was the cousin of George Hayter, court painter to Queen Victoria. Hope then read a scene from the book in which Kezia tells her fellow prisoners about the time she met Queen Victoria.

SC asked Hope about the other female characters who feature in the book, christened the ‘Newgate Nannies’. Hope said she’d invented them to introduce a bit of grit in the form of some hard, rough, tough women and also because her daughter (who just happens to be bestselling author Sophie Hannah) always tells her she can’t do ‘proper’ villains. The ‘Newgate Nannies’ are there to provide a bit of comedy as well, she explained, although they’re definitely women you wouldn’t want to cross.

The novel opens with (in Hope’s words) a “dastardly deed” and the reader soon learns one of the women is not who she says she is.  She explained there were 200 women on the ship but only twenty who sewed the quilt, so that helped her narrow down the number of suspects. Given all the suspects are in one place making it a classic closed room mystery, SC wondered how much of a challenge it was to be confined to one location? Hope said she ‘cheated’ by allowing the reader to go back in time to the past lives of three of the women.

SC felt the book really immerses the reader in life on board the Rajah and asked Hope about her research. Hope confessed it’s easy to get so excited about research that you never get around to writing. Engagingly self-deprecating, she described herself as ‘extremely lazy’ when it comes to research, claiming she read one book and that was it. However, she was fortunate to be contacted by an old friend who just happens to be an expert in 19th century textiles. Asked about the book’s title – Conviction – Hope explained it has a double meaning in the sense that the women are convicts but also Kezia is an extremely pious Christian with strong religious belief.

20190930_114519_resized

In Stephanie’s novel, Rose Gold spends the first eighteen years of her life believing she is sick. However it transpires her mother, Patty, has made it all up and there was nothing wrong with Rose Gold at all.  Stephanie described The Recovery of Rose Gold as being about “obsession, reconciliation, revenge and the unbreakable bond between mother and daughter”. She then read an excerpt from the first chapter of the book.

Stephanie said the idea for the book arose from the experience of a close friend who is a teacher and became concerned about a student. Stephanie started to research Munchausen’s syndrome and was intrigued to learn the perpetrators are usually mothers. Told from the alternating points of view of Rose Gold and her mother, Stephanie confessed she found getting inside the head of Patty a ‘meaty challenge’ but one she relished. Observing the adage that every villain in a story believes they’re the hero, she said she’d tried hard to make Patty a well-rounded character.

SC observed that early on in the book the reader learns Patty has poisoned Rose Gold but in another sort of novel that could have been the ‘big reveal’. Had Stephanie at any point considered making the disclosure of this fact the ending of the book? Stephanie said no because she was more interested in allowing the reader to get inside the head of Patty. SC asked if Patty’s voice had come to her easily. Stephanie said it had – a ‘sarcastic, snippy tone’ with a Midwestern accent. Getting Rose Gold’s voice had been a lot harder and took a number of drafts. For instance, being socially isolated, with no TV and her reading restricted, Rose Gold wouldn’t be aware of some colloquialisms.

Asked if they had any advice for aspiring novelists, both Hope and Stephanie were strong advocates of the benefit of an agent and of having a plan of the outline structure of a book before starting to write. Hope joked that her daughter positively insists she does this. Stephanie said she’d found the feedback from tutors and fellow students on her Creative Writing degree invaluable. (The Recovery of Rose Gold was her thesis.)

The two authors shared their experience of being edited. Having worked in advertising previously, Stephanie was used to having her work critiqued. She observed that, when someone wants to publish your book, you soon feel you’re on the same team. Hope said she’d always been very happy to have others suggest changes – adding jokingly, ‘As long as I agree with them!’ A good editor, she feels, will suggest ‘What about doing this?’ and she’ll wonder, ‘Why didn’t I think of that?’

At this point Hope said she thought she should come clean that, although Conviction is a debut for Hope Adams, this is a pseudonym and as her real self (Adele Geras) she has been writing for forty years, mainly books for children and teenagers. She decided to use a pseudonym because she wanted to make Conviction a very different book and chose a plain name and one with a surname at the top of the alphabet – useful on bookshop shelves! She joked that she’s had to practice a new signature. (She got plenty of practice shortly afterwards as we queued to have her sign our proof copies!)

Questions from the audience included:

  • How both authors feel about reviews and reader feedback – Hope regretted it is so difficult to get reviews, especially of children’s books and women’s fiction. Stephanie said she’d been advised not to read reviews on Amazon or Goodreads!
  • If, now they write, they’re put off reading books or if it’s still a real pleasure – Hope says she reads totally uncritically but has no patience with books she’s not enjoying and pleaded with us not to be ‘dutiful readers’ and finish books for the sake of it. Stephanie says she loves reading across all genres.
  • What they’re working on next – Hope is still focused on seeing Conviction through its final stages to publication. Stephanie is writing her second book which involves cults and is told from three points of view.

20191002_111651-1_resizedThose of us lucky enough to attend the event left with proof copies of both books. Other readers will have to wait until next year to get their hands on copies. However, on the evidence of today, it will be well worth the wait.

Thanks to Michael Joseph, Henley Literary Festival and Hobbs of Henley for organising a fantastic event.