Blog Tour/Excerpt: With or Without You by Shari Low

I’m delighted to be hosting today’s stop on the blog tour for the latest novel by Shari Low, With or Without You.  It’s described as ‘a clever, captivating and bittersweet story of what might have been’, perfect for fans of Jojo Moyes and Marian Keyes.

You can read an excerpt from With or Without You below.  Do check out the other great bloggers taking part in the tour for reviews, interviews and more excerpts from the book.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin


With or Without YouAbout the Book

Have you ever made a life-changing decision and then wondered if you made the right one…?

When Liv and Nate walked up the aisle, Liv knew she was marrying the one, her soul mate and her best friend. Six years later, it feels like routine and friendship is all they have left in common. What happened to the fun, the excitement, the lust, the love?

In the closing moments of 1999, Liv and Nate decide to go their separate ways, but at the last minute, Liv wavers. Should she stay or should she go? Over the next twenty years we follow the parallel stories to discover if Liv’s life, heart and future have been better with Nate… Or without him?

Format: ebook (pp.)            Publisher: Aria Fiction
Published: 1st June 2018    Genre: Fiction, Romance

Purchase Links*
Amazon.co.uk  ǀ  Amazon.com ǀ Kobo | iBooks | Google Play
*links provided for convenience, not as part of any affiliate programme

Find With or Without You on Goodreads


Excerpt from With or Without You by Shari Low

Prologue

The Last Minute of 1999

There were sixty seconds left of the twentieth century.

Hogmanay. The biggest night of the Scottish celebratory calendar, when we eat, we sing, we dance, and we welcome in the New Year with the people we love. The music was blaring, the revellers were dancing up a storm, and glasses were being topped up with champagne, as I leant close to my husband’s ear.

‘I wish you’d had an affair,’ I said, my voice cracking. ‘It would be so much easier to do this.’

Nate, smiled, leaned in and kissed me, but not with any grand passion. That was part of the problem. We’d been together since midway through uni, and then married the year after we graduated, and since the day we’d danced up the aisle we’d had five years of contentment.

Contentment.

I hated that word. Imagine the obituary. RIP Liv Jamieson – a contented life. Worse, who wanted to be content at the age of twenty-eight? I wanted passion and excitement and maybe the odd little bit of danger, but contentment? It was like a scarf of boredom that got tighter with each passing year, until I could barely breathe.

I loved Nate, but – clichéd as it was – I wasn’t in love with him anymore. There was no-one else, no drama, no big scandal or cataclysmic event. Just a gradual drifting apart. A disconnection. And, in a twisted demonstration of our compatibility, he had reluctantly admitted that – while he wasn’t as far along the road of acceptance as me – he knew there was something missing too.

I loved him. He loved me. It just wasn’t enough.

Nate pulled back and pushed a stray curl of my red hair back from my face. ‘An affair? What if I told you I’ve had Kylie Minogue living in the loft for the last year because we’re having a torrid fling and she can’t get enough of me?’

‘I’d say please tell her I’ll let her have you – as long as she’s willing to trade you for her entire wardrobe.’

Nate’s brown eyes creased at the side as he laughed. It was my very favourite thing about him.

We’d tried. We really had. The previous January, just a day into 1999, we’d talked, and we’d agreed to give it everything we had for a year, determined to reignite the spark between us. We’d had weekly date nights. Lazy Sunday sex. Weekend breaks to quiet country cottages and busy city hotels. A fantastic holiday to Bali where we’d taken long moonlit strolls along the sands. We’d hung out with our gang of mutual friends and we’d laughed, celebrated, partied, and discussed it long into many nights.

Yet, much as it destroyed us to admit it, we were still in that ‘best friends’ zone. My heart didn’t flutter when he entered a room. His gaze made me smile, but it didn’t make my libido throb with lust. And neither of us could shake the feeling that there was something – or someone – else out there for us.

So we’d decided to call it a day. To wish each other well, split the CD collection and move on. That makes it all sound so simple, when the truth was that a piece of my heart felt like it was being surgically removed by a jackhammer.

Nate wasn’t one hundred per cent sure. He didn’t like change. Preferred familiarity and stability to the unknown. But he said he loved me too much to make me stay in a marriage that didn’t make me happy. And if he were honest, our marriage wasn’t making him happy either, not like he should have been. I wanted more for me, for him, for both of us.

Tonight was our last night together. It seemed apt. Fitting. The final day of the century, a chapter closing, and a whole new world out there for us to explore.  And if I kept telling myself that this was a positive move; the right thing to do, it squashed the part of me that was terrified.

I saw his lips move again. ‘Liv, are you…?’

I missed the last bit. It got carried away on the wave of noise that suddenly engulfed the room.

Ten…

The lead singer of the band was counting down the seconds to midnight. Every year we headed to The Lomond Grange, a gorgeous stately manor hotel on the edge of Loch Lomond, about forty minutes from home, to bring in the coming year. Despite our sadness, we hadn’t wanted to bail out on the people who shared our lives, so here we were. One last hurrah. On the dance floor, our closest friends, Sasha and Justin stood next to Chloe and Rob, all of them with their champagne glasses in hand, party poppers at the ready, expressions oozing excitement, braced for the big moment.

Nine… Nine seconds until my marriage was over.

A wave of sorrow.

Eight… ‘What did you say?’ I asked him.

Seven… Seven seconds until my marriage was over.

He had to lean right into my ear so I could hear him. ‘I said are you absolutely sure?’

Six… A stomach flip of doubt. We’d discussed this to death. Yes, I was sure. Of course I was. So was he. We’d agreed.

Five… Five seconds until my marriage was over.

‘Yes. Why are you asking now?’

Four… ‘I think…’ I could feel his breath on the side of my face. ‘I think I want to give it one more try.’

Three… Three seconds until my marriage was over.

A sick feeling of panic rising to my throat.

Two… ‘But Nate, we both know it’s time to move on.’ We did. Didn’t we?

One… ‘One more try, Liv. We owe it to each other to give it more time.’

Noooooo. This wasn’t the deal. We’d tried. It hadn’t worked. We weren’t right for each other. It was time to move on, to take different paths.

A deafening cacophony of sound erupted in the room. Happy New Year. Streamers shot in the air. Bagpipes bellowed out a chorus of Auld Lang Syne to say goodbye to the past and welcome the twenty first century.

We were entering a new millennium.

But was I going to spend it with Nate…

…Or without him?


ShariLowAbout the Author

Shari Low has published twenty novels over the last two decades. She also writes for newspapers, magazines and television. Once upon a time, she got engaged to a guy she’d known for a week, and twenty-something years later, they live in Glasgow with their two teenage sons and a labradoodle.

Connect with Shari

Website  ǀ  Facebook  ǀ  Twitter ǀ  Goodreads

 

With or Without You blog tour banner (2)

 

 

Blog Tour/Book Review: Juliet & Romeo by David Hewson

Juliet & Romeo BLog Tour

I’m thrilled to be hosting the first stop on the blog tour for Juliet & Romeo, David Hewson’s “novel retelling” of Shakespeare’s famous play about Verona’s star-crossed lovers.  Happy publication day, David!  I have a fascinating Q&A with David and you can also read my review of Juliet & Romeo and find out the many things I loved about the book.

Do look out for the posts by the other fantastic book bloggers taking part in the tour.

I’d like to thank Emily at The Dome Press for inviting me to attend the book launch for Juliet & Romeo on 15th May in the wonderful surroundings of Goldsboro Books in Cecil Court, London.  If you love books even just a teeny bit and you’re ever in that area, you simply to have to pay it a visit.


Juliet and RomeoAbout the Book

Two young people meet: Romeo, desperate for love before being sent away to study, and Juliet facing a forced marriage to a nobleman she doesn’t know. Fate and circumstance bring them together in a desperate attempt to thwart their parents with a secret marriage. But in a single fateful week, their intricate scheming falls terribly apart.

Shakespeare’s most well-known and well-loved play has been turned in to a gripping romantic thriller with a modern twist. Rich with the sights and sounds of medieval Italy, peopled with a vibrant cast of characters who spring from the page, this is Shakespeare as you’ve never read it before.

Format: Hardcover (352 pp.) paperback, ebook (256 pp.) Publisher: The Dome Press.  Published: 17th May 2018                                            Genre: Historical Fiction

Purchase Links*
Publisher | Amazon.co.uk  ǀ  Amazon.com  ǀ Audible (audiobook) | Hive.co.uk (supporting UK bookshops)
*links provided for convenience, not as part of any affiliate programme

Find Juliet & Romeo on Goodreads


Interview with David Hewson, author of Juliet & Romeo

David, let’s get the obvious question out of the way first… The book’s title is Juliet & Romeo, not Romeo & Juliet.  What is the significance of this inversion?

It’s simple really. If you look at the story very closely – and I include in this the versions before Shakespeare since he didn’t invent it – I think it becomes obvious that Juliet deserves to be the focus of the narrative. Romeo is a young, idealistic lad who’s desperate to be in love. Juliet’s an intelligent young woman facing a forced marriage to someone she doesn’t know, someone she loathes when she meets him. It’s an effective death sentence. She’s the one in true jeopardy. But Shakespeare, of course, couldn’t work with women actors because it was illegal for them to appear on stage. So I wanted to bring her to the forefront in a way that was difficult in Elizabethan times.

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is an iconic text.  Did you approach retelling the story with a degree of trepidation or with excitement about the possibilities?

I’ve adapted two previous Shakespeare plays for Audible before, Macbeth and Hamlet, with my good friend AJ Hartley who’s a Shakespeare professor. So I’m familiar with the challenges though this time I’m on my own. I also adapted all three series of The Killing on TV into books which may sound very different but pose the same technical issues – point of view, the fact that books require more in the way of explanation and back story than drama.

The important thing with all adaptations is to be respectful of the original but never in awe of it. Adaptation means change – you’re not trying to photocopy what went before. So I took a free and roaming approach to the job. Before I wrote a word I went to Verona to scan out real life locations and made some of the key decisions about what I was going to change too. It was a fun project throughout – especially with Richard Armitage on board for the audio original. He’s an amazing talent – we’re both up for best audio original production in the Audies, the audio Oscars, in New York at the end of May which is going to be an exciting night.

I understand you went back to the original Italian stories on which Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is based.   Can you us a bit more about this and how it changed your view of the story?

The main change was in the portrayal of Juliet. First, they didn’t, unlike Shakespeare, see her as thirteen years old – which frankly is ridiculous and not just because of the sexual connotations. She’s far too adult and smart to be thirteen so in this version I restore her to sixteen which was how the earlier versions saw her. They also made me realise I had to change the telling of their first meeting too. In medieval literature there was the notion of ‘courtly love’, which was a sort of love at first sight on steroids. Shakespeare sort of follows this line and has the loved-up couple basically decide they’re made for one another in sixteen or seventeen lines. The earlier versions take it for granted that courtly love happens and that’s that. I knew this wasn’t going to work for a modern retelling so that part of the story is completely different in the book, and much more of a modern meeting where the ice is broken not by flowery declarations of love but the simple fact Romeo makes Juliet laugh – when she’s not in much of a laughing mood.

The Hogarth Shakespeare project has seen authors such as Margaret Atwood, Tracy Chevalier and Jo Nesbo take on the challenge of reinterpreting Shakespeare’s plays.   What do you think is the attraction of retellings of literary classics for authors, and for readers?

In a way every production of Shakespeare is a kind of retelling since the originals are so open to interpretation. You can play Henry V as a nationalistic paean of praise to mighty England or a bold anti-war statement. Hamlet can be portrayed any number of ways. The other thing about Shakespeare is he manages to engage with themes that are timeless. The core of this story for me is identity – are we the people we feel ourselves to be inside or the masks that society, family, church the world demand we wear? How far can you really be yourself? What’s the price and is it worth paying? So really the attraction is seeing familiar, well-loved stories in a new light, from a different perspective. And with this one people shouldn’t expect the story they may think they know already. It’s not a simple ’novelisation’ at all.

What’s your own favourite literary retelling?

Robert Graves’ brilliant I, Claudius and Claudius the God. Graves was a classical scholar who’d earlier translated Suetonius’ The Twelve Caesars. After working on that history Graves claimed Claudius came to him in a dream and demanded the story be told in his own voice. So he took a lot of material from Suetonius and other historians of the time and turned the events and personalities in them into a wonderful couple of novels.

Of course fictional history often becomes accepted history too. So we now think of Claudius as a bumbling, gentle chap who went a bit bad towards the end. When in truth he was probably just as much a tyrant as the others. The same with Richard III who’s principally seen through the lens of Shakespeare these days, though few people realise Shakespeare was writing for a Tudor monarch in the line that took the crown of Richard (and may have damned him unfairly on the way).

When did you first see the elements of ‘a gripping romantic thriller’ in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet?

After we did Macbeth (with Alan Cumming) and Hamlet (with Richard Armitage) we got so many people pleading for more Shakespeare. Quite a lot of people asking that we do all the plays this way (which isn’t going to happen). So I set about wondering about which play to do next. Romeo and Juliet interested me because I felt the story was often seen, unfairly, as a simple romance, two teenagers making terrible decisions. There seemed a lot more to it than that. It also has an extraordinary structure, starting off almost as raw, rude street comedy, moving into romance, suspense, thriller, then finally, in the crypt, a kind of horror tale. I liked the idea of the challenge of trying to turn that into a modern language novel and also just burrowing beneath the surface of a story that’s richer than many believe.

Juliet & Romeo retains the original play’s medieval setting and location.  Did you consider setting it in a different time period?

It’s unclear exactly when the original tale is meant to be set. Shakespeare doesn’t say – he’s a dramatist and has no need. The literary versions point to Verona in the fourteenth century. I move it forwards a hundred years to 1499 so that it could reflect what we now call the Renaissance. The idea of humanism chimes very clearly with the theme of identity in the play. The stress on the individual within society, the idea that we’re not all slaves to the systems that went before. I really didn’t even think about making it one of those adaptations that translates the story to a council estate in Bermondsey or something. Nothing wrong with that but I felt this version deserved to be in historical Verona, nowhere else.

On the other hand, you’ve chosen to use modern dialogue.  What was the thinking behind this?

Simple – I want the story to be read and the more road blocks you put in the way of the reader, the less that’s going to happen. The play itself is incredibly difficult to read in parts because the language is so opaque and cryptic. Also I wanted to avoid the trap of using bits of Italian – grazie and the like – to try to give it a fake Italian feel. When Richard narrated he used a variety of accents, but only one that is halfway Italian. You want to be understood without difficulty and modern English is the way to do that. I try to avoid anachronisms such as jarring modern terms of speech for example. But you can get hung up on language too much. The characters in ‘real life’ wouldn’t be speaking Italian at all – the language as we know it didn’t exist back then, and they’d probably be speaking a version of Veneto, which is close to Croatian and still heard in parts of the region today.

Your Nic Costa crime mystery series is set mainly in Rome, your books based on the TV series The Killing are set in Copenhagen and your Pieter Vos series is set in Amsterdam.  How important is location to your stories?

It’s essential. Books don’t demand locations, they demand worlds. You need to see them, hear them, smell them, feel them, taste them. It’s important too for me that the story you tell can come from that place and that place alone. If this could be transplanted as it stands to any other city then I’ve failed. The place is as much a part of the story as the characters and the events they meet along the way.

What are you working on next?

Next up in July is my first new Nic Costa in nine years. It’s called The Savage Shore and is set in Calabria where Costa and crew have been sent undercover to try to wangle the defection of a crime lord from the local mafia. It’s a book I’ve been meaning to write for years since so many people have been asking for a new Costa. And I love the characters too, though I’m particularly beastly towards them in this. Later in the year I have a new audio project coming out which is a long way from Shakespeare (and secret still so I can’t talk about it). Then next year there’ll be a new standalone crime story set in a location that’s new for me. Busy times…

Thank you, David, for those fascinating answers to my questions.  


My Review

In Juliet & Romeo, the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is of longstanding and born out of a friendship betrayed (‘Time had dealt its blows, yet the enmity between them had never wavered’) and a trade war over pre-eminence in the wine trade.  The uneasy relations between the two families simmer in the heat of a Verona summer, threatening to boil over at any minute.  It even extends to each family’s servants, ‘sharing the same borrowed hatred and never asking why’.

The author brings the reader a Juliet who is intelligent, questioning, spirited and independent-minded.   She finds herself rebelling against the expectations of her parents (primarily the expectations of her father) to make a marriage that will advance the family’s interests, describing herself as ‘a tiny bird in a tiny cage my father and the rest have made for me.’    For the reason explained by the author in his Historical Notes, this Juliet is older than depicted in Shakespeare’s play, more confident and sure of herself, with a witty sense of humour.

Romeo is thoughtful and longs to be a writer although, again, his family see a different future for him, in the law this time.  Although the setting is medieval – 1499, to be precise – there are no ‘thee’s’ and ‘thou’s’ in this book, instead the characters express themselves in modern dialogue, including slang and some juicy insults.  For example, Romeo’s erstwhile love, the daughter of a livestock merchant, is described at one point as ‘randy Rosaline from the knacker’s yard.

The author brings alive the Verona of the period through descriptions of the houses, palazzos, piazzas, clothing and food.  I could almost sense the aromas from the dishes at a particularly lavish banquet organised by the Capulets to try to impress their pick of suitor for Juliet, Count Paris.  ‘Boned roast goat’s head covered in white meat sauce and decorated with pomegranate seeds.  Fried trout caught in Lake Garda by busy cormorants.  Cucumbers with dill.  Chicken pie with cherries.  Tart with cheese and chard and saffron.  And pastissada de caval, horsemeat stew slow cooked until it was near black, seasoned with laurel, nutmeg and cloves, a dish Verona had been eating for so long it seemed as much a part of the city as its old stone walls and the constant flow of the Adige.’   (OK, not so sure about the horsemeat stew.)  

The novel explores a number of themes, including that of possession and ownership.  At one point, Luca Capulet, insisting that Juliet’s marriage to Count Paris will go ahead, states: “This marriage is made.  Not in heaven.  But by me.”  A chuckle then. “The household god.”    When Count Paris presents Juliet with a ring as a token of his love, she is shocked to see it bears the inscription ‘I have obtained whom God ordained.’ Days later, preparing for her wedding against her will, Juliet reflects, ‘She felt as if she were nothing more than a cog in the mechanism of a relentless machine, turning to the will of others.’  Even Romeo at one point wonders, ‘How much of love was the noble sacrifice that verse portrayed?  How much a selfish, obsessional need to possess another?’  With dread, he recognises in himself ‘a man possessed, who craved to possess in return’.

Blackadder_2_nursieJuliet & Romeo has everything you would expect of a Shakespearean drama – masks and disguises, mistaken identities, chance meetings, fight scenes, thwarted lovers and comic interludes.  Speaking of the latter, from the cast of secondary characters, I have to pick out Nurse.  With her excruciatingly embarrassing stories about Juliet when she was a baby and her bawdy comments, she reminded me of Nursie in Blackadder 2 (as played by the wonderful Patsy Byrne).

The publishers describe Juliet & Romeo as ‘a gripping romantic thriller’ and it certainly fits that bill in terms of its pace and its menu of intrigue, mystery, body count and more than one race against time.  In answer to one of my questions above, David comments that ‘Adaptation means change’.  I’m not going to tell you what one of those key changes is, you’re going to have to read the book to find out.  What I will say is that it’s entirely in keeping with the character the author has created.

Whether you have read Shakespeare’s play, seen film versions of the play or know only the outlines of the story of Romeo and Juliet, you will find much to enjoy in this “novel retelling”.  It would also be a superb introduction to Shakespeare’s play.  As David mentioned above, the audiobook version of Juliet & Romeo, from which this novel is derived, has been nominated for this year’s Audies, the audio Oscars.  Reading this novel has certainly made me want to seek out that version.

I received an uncorrected proof copy courtesy of publishers, The Dome Press, in return for an honest and unbiased review.  Please note all quotations are from the uncorrected proof copy.

Follow my blog with Bloglovin

In three words: Pacy, romantic, thrilling

Try something similar…New Boy by Tracy Chevalier (click here to read my review)


David HewsonAbout the Author

David Hewson is the author of more than 20 published novels including the Pieter Vos series set in Amsterdam and the Nic Costa books set in Rome.

His acclaimed book adaptations of The Killing television series were published around the world. His audio adaptations of Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Hamlet with A.J. Hartley, narrated by Alan Cumming and Richard Armitage respectively, were both shortlisted for Audie Awards.

A former journalist with the Sunday Times, Independent and The Times he lives in Kent. His first book with The Dome Press, Juliet and Romeo, will be published in May 2018.

Connect with David

Website  ǀ  Facebook  ǀ  Twitter  ǀ  Instagram ǀ Goodreads